US State Department - Problems/Promises for Russia
“Knowledge is practically nothing
There have been several stories written over the years about economies shifting to knowledge-based strategies. Fueled by the OECD, The European Union, The World Bank and other professional and industry groups, managers worldwide have realized the implications for developing and industrialized nations alike.
Thanks to a recent initiative by Sue Nelson of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, the US State Department convened a full day conference “to assess the potential of Russia’s rich human capital to move the economy from one based upon natural resources and individual output to one based upon the creation and application of knowledge.”
It was the day after a front page feature story ran in The Washington Post (8/19/01) about the “Journey to the New Russia” illustrating the national divide 10 years after the failed coup in August, 1991, that set in motion the collapse of the Soviet Union. This followed another feature story in the Economist on “Putin’s Choice” describing the paradox of 3 contradictory trends - revival, stagnation and decline. Although there are 8M Russians working in small businesses, most managers are nowhere near international standards. The reported ‘capital flight’ - averaging $1.5B each month - shows there are plenty of missed (innovation) opportunities.
This provided the ENTOVATION work of Dr. Tom Malone, who was featured in Global Learn Day IV, and Debra Amidon to frame a discussion on “Millennium Challenge for Russia” with presentations from others from the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Research Council, Microsoft Consulting Services, RAND Corporation, the International Finance Corporation, the US Civilian R&D Foundation and The World Bank.
Using the foundation for sustainability outlined for the Western Hemisphere Knowledge Partnership (WHKP) that was premiered in Boston (USA) in July, participants imagined a vision (and relevant strategies) for such a nation.
It is not these factors individually, but the inter-relationship of how these economic elements combine to establish conducive to attracting foreign investment, stimulating entrepreneurial management and taking advantage of the opportunities technological advancement provides. Citing the OECD 1996 Report on Knowledge-Based economies, we use the working definition:
Some presentation highlights:
Although comments were all made off the record and not for attribution, there were several compelling points raised.
One presenter discussed the ‘brain drain’ and the need to reverse the outflow of $230B per year by inspiring a climate and confidence to keep people at home (i.e., converting the economy to a ‘brain gain’).
Another provided the trend analysis related to R&D expenditures, employment in the IT sector, military dimensions and others reaching the conclusion that central to resolving the paradox (referenced above) is to restore the pipeline with young entrepreneurs.
A third traced the evolution of the relationship between education and technology outlining the problem of IT penetration coming from a lack of adequate financing, no reaction (or ability to react) to changing business demands and no alignment with international standards. He referred to the new government initiative - “Electronic Russia” (goal of 25M Russians on-line by 2010) - that was introduced July 5th, 2001, to define more efficient government management systems.
Still another followed with a prospectus for an “e-Russia” defining the infrastructure changes and policy implications necessary to ensure such a transformation. He suggested that the answers may not lie in getting a lot of money; but rather “start small, build successes and scale up.” He provided insight into the problems of the culture not known for being open nor using knowledge that might come from the ‘front lines.’ He queries - as might be queried of other developing nations - Does Russia want to be an Open Society? His conclusion - build a pro-business environment.
Others described modern processes for getting research out of the laboratories and into the market. Some were experts on venture capital financing, the ‘flowering of domestic demand,’ grant assistance programs and the leadership positioning needed by Russia for other neighboring countries in the region.
Tom Malone (North Caroline State University), together with Gary W. Yohe (Wesleyan University), distributed a briefing “Toward a Knowledge-Based Economy in the Russian Federation.” They outline the driving forces of demographic growth and gains in productivity (and their asymmetry) can: threaten the finite capacity of air, water, sunshine and plant and ecosystems that to sustain expanding human activity on the planet, increase the economic inequity among nations (as well as within their borders) and exacerbate social stability.
However, with a comparative scenarios of Population, GNP/cap and GNP of countries such as Russia with India, Ireland and China, they were able to create a template of sustainability with modest curtailment of economic production and consumption, moderation in population growth and reasonable increases in productivity driven by the further development of knowledge through new collaboration between disciplines and societal sectors. The conclusion was that with appropriate knowledge partnerships, the Russian Federation has a good chance of making a significant contribution/transition into the Knowledge Age. “There is a path forward - one that is needed by Russia, the US and all nations - a society in which all of the basic needs and wants can be met by successive generations while maintaining a healthy, physically attractive, and biologically productive environment. We can invent (innovate) our future rather than stumble mindlessly and competitively.” For copies of the paper and information about the Western Hemisphere partnership, contact Dr. Malone directly (email@example.com).
The point is that the session provided a very thoughtful analysis with a variety of perspectives - each in and of itself offering some plausible solutions. Together, they created a direction forward.
This was a seminal event being sponsored by the US State Department. The first national conference on the Knowledge Economy was held in the US in 1987. Although there were several national initiatives (e.g., France in 1989 and Poland in 1993) the European Union did not provide the regional emphasis until 1997 (Utrecht, The Netherlands). The Global Knowledge Partnership - 1st held in Toronto (Canada) and subsequently in Malaysia (2000) - and The World Bank (with their 1999-2000 World Development Report) fueled developing nations; and the OECD articles (1996 and most recently in 1999 National Innovation Systems reports) have provided the working definitions leading to some indicators for building Knowledge-Based Societies. Recent initiatives begun with the Intellectual Capital Reports of Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands and Israel - together with recently released reports in measuring intangible value (e.g., the Brookings Institute and FASB) have evolved our attempts to develop relevant innovation indicators. [For the Knowledge Societies Timeline, contact firstname.lastname@example.org].
Combined insights were summarized in the form of a pneumonic:
Essentially, the new economy demands a entrepreneurial spirit (and talent), a favorable business climate and a culture that is receptive to learning and change. Russia -as does every nation - has a unique history, heritage and strengths to be leveraged. New leadership appears to be providing a frame for realizing the vision of the country. To be competitive in the new economic world order, nations must preserve the best of their past while aligning for future opportunities - the prescription for future sustainability.
Only the Beginning:
Stay tuned for other unexpected examples as reported recently through the Global Knowledge Development electronic forum: “Imagine a tiny, beautiful, land-locked, densely populated and extremely poor African country that seven years ago was the site of a devastating civil war and genocide that left it in tatters. Now imagine a country that sets up an ICT Commission headed by its President; that adopts a
National ICT Policy for the country and that sets up a top level national IT Agency to oversee a 400-page 5-year US$500 million plan and strategy for ICT. And finally imagine a country that commits to transforming itself from an essentially agrarian economy to a knowledge-based society within twenty years and that plans to become a services center in its region, despite being poorer than its neighbors and much less well-endowed with natural resources. Hard to reconcile these images, but they are indeed all of Rwanda.” [Author’s note: we believe that the “I” in ICT stands for Innovation, not Information!] Visit - http://www.entovation.com/whatsnew/knowledge-societies.htm - for more background on such national conversions. These are only the initial progress reports to be documented in unexpected places around the world.
The emerging Knowledge Economy affords a new source of wealth-creation based upon intellectual assets, collaborative learning networks and effective infusion of advanced technology. Countries - developing and industrialized nations alike - that are able to calibrate and manage their innovation capacity are likely to maintain their future prosperity and sustainability. A new program to define the ‘Innovation Capital of Nations’ provides an intensive fact-finding/reporting mechanism for country/region leadership to identify and track critical economic indicators integral to the vitality of a nation’s economy, resulting in a shared vision, common language and leveraged worldwide strategy. The program has multiple objectives:
For several years, Konstantin Golubev has
served as a representative of the
|Atlas of Knowledge Innovation® | Knowledge Concert | Knowledge Innovation® Software | Knowledge Millennium Generation | Virtual Knowledge Officer | The 7 C's of Knowledge Leadership | Speech to PDVSA|
International. All rights reserved.